Bernie gives a strong speech, to an of-course empty house, thankfully avoiding the term "fascism" and which finally gets around to stating an almost comprehensive economic justice/social democratic platform on the fucking basics.
But as usual, the Pied Piper from Vermont manages to hippify the issue by complaining about "the three billionaires" who own more wealth than 70% of the population. Okee... but what does the other 30% own? How much is owned by the 60% or 40% or 20% ?
F. Braudel, the French economic historian, points out that historically, in all societies, 2% own and control. To this one can add an additional 3-5% who are the enablers, the assitants, the managers of the 2% You can call this the haute bourgeoise or upper middle class. So it is NOT just a matter of the 1% or the 2%. The inequity involves at least the upper 7%.
"According to recent data, to be in the upper 7% of earners, you would typically need an annual income exceeding $150,000;" (Google) Got that? A mere 150K gets you into the club.
It is the genius of America that, in the past 40 years it actually expanded the upper middle class, while shrinking the middle middle and growing the lower. (See Pew "The American Middle Class.")
Now, many variables go into defining and measuring "wealth" and the inclusion of "two income earners" in the past 40 years, screws up the traditional analysis. But the basic point remains: the issue of inequity is not just a matter of Bezos, Musk, and Zuckerberg; it is also a matter of Dimon, Blankfein, Buffet and a thousand billionaries, millionaires, CEO's, passive investors and the like. And it is not just a matter of them but also of anyone who is a "stakeholder" in the system. Got 401(k)?
The Demorats are always whining about "systemic racism" but they never talk about "systemic economic oppression" because it includes the very people they most represent.
I hate to sound like Savanarola, but it's the insescapble truth. Bernie is a faux leftist because he consistently avoids the real class implications of our current "inequity."
I will never forget the video interview the New York Slime did with some metro New York Boomers who were definitely WITH>HER and not voting for Bernie. "Oh said one salt and pepper Westchesterite (neé Woodstocker), "I'm in favor of Medicare for all, BUT I CAN WAIT."
When I look at a news report and see a gathering of RFKjr supporters, or Kamala supporters, or Biden supporters I always see people who can wait. And wait they do, whatever excuse they use for doing so.
The rich man argues, Whom am I wronging so long as I keep what is my own? .... Now after seizing all things in your insatiable greed, and thus shutting out others, do you really think you are wronging no man? ... The man who steals a coat from another is called a thief. Is he who can clothe a naked man and will not, worthy of any other name? The bread, which you keep in the store, is the hungry man's bread. The cloak, which you guard in the chest, belongs to the naked man. The sandals rotting in your house belong to him who goes barefoot. The silver you hide away belongs to the needy. Thus it is that you are wronging as many men as you might help if you chose (St. Basil (330-375).)
Of course it is no longer a question of coats and sandals but of stocks and mortgages. Still, it involves "shutting out others" because no man gains else another looses, no matter how hidden or attenuated the cause. Liberalism is an exercise in cognative dissonance; looking at the homeless, saying "what a shame" and not seeing one's self as cause.
I learned this as a child in Mexico where my parents moved when I was five and by some cosmic glitch I was now "upper class." I recall being truly shocked by poverty I hadn't even imagined before and, in particular, by little boys just myself, only a little darker, running around ragged and barefoot selling Chicle's between rows of cars. I'd look at them through the SAF-T glass of the car and wonder what it felt like to be so vulnerable and shoeless on hot and rough pavement. I am told that I was so distressed that I wanted to give away my Christmans money, but my parents prevented my rashness. Be reasonable, they said, just give away a few pesos. Well... the long and short of it was I learned to be reasonable about it. When I was older, visiting Americans would be shocked at the poverty. "How can you stand," they'd ask, "living next to such poverty?!" (We could never do such a thing in Westchester, right?) "Oh," I'd reply, "one gets used to it."
Yes indeed, one does get used to another's poverty; and attitudes like that will earn us a seat in hell. Make no mistake.
I hate to sound like Lenin, so I'll sound like Lucy Parsons instead "Never be deceived that the rich will allow you to vote away their wealth."
So ... as usual Bernie's "ferocious diatribe" will go nowhere.
©